|
Scanner Tips
- (February - 2009)
Selecting a Scanner
Types of Scanners
Scanners come in a
variety of configurations. The type you should consider depends
on both your planned scanning needs and your budget.

-
Drum scanners.
This type of scanner provides the highest level of image
quality. They are typically found at professional printing
businesses. In a drum scanner, the original is attached to a
cylindrical drum and rotated past the sensing elements. These
scanners are very expensive, with capabilities that go well
beyond the needs of desktop scanning.
-
Flatbed scanners.
This type of scanner provides a flat glass surface onto which
the original is placed. The illumination and sensing elements
move under the glass to scan the image. Flatbed scanners are
available in a wide range of sizes, prices, and capabilities.
Some flatbeds offer a transparency scanning adapter as an
option.
-
Single sheet scanners.
This type of scanner is designed for single sheets of paper.
You insert one edge of the paper in a slot and the scanner
grabs it, feeds it past the sensing array, and passes it out
the other side. Some single sheet scanners are even integrated
into keyboards. Such scanners were originally designed for
digitizing documents and images for archiving, and many models
are not suitable for creating high-quality images.
-
Sheet-fed scanners.
These scanners take a stack of pages and scan them in sequence
while you get coffee. Some even do duplex (2 sided) scans.
They are very useful in some situations but not much use to
the philatelist.
-
Photo scanners.
This type of scanner is designed to scan snapshots up to
approximately 4´6 inches in size. Some are separate desktop
units; others install directly into a computer much like a
diskette drive.
-
Hand scanners.
This type of scanner requires the user to manually scan an
image. Hand scanners look something like an overgrown mouse.
To scan, you manually drag the unit over the original
document. Handheld scanners are suitable only for small
originals that are no wider than the scanner itself. In
theory, most hand scanners permit you to scan a wide original
in two or more passes and "stitch" the scans together into a
final image. This, however, never works as well as the
manufacturers claim.
-
Slide scanners.
This type of scanner is designed for scanning slides
(transparencies) rather than opaque originals, such as
photographic prints. While rarely relevant for scanning
philatelic material, a dedicated slide scanner is the best
choice for scanning slides. Some flatbed scanners come with
transparency adapters but they do not provide top quality
results, particularly with small slides such as 35mm. Slide
scanners have very high resolution, typically a minimum of
2400 dpi, required for getting all the details out of your
slides. Many slide scanners also have the ability to scan
color negatives and to convert the negative image to a
positive image.
For
philatelic purposes, a flatbed scanner is undoubtedly the most
versatile. You can scan anything from a single stamp to an
entire stock book or album page. A hand scanner may be a viable
alternative, particularly if your budget is tight. Their width
limitation does not matter so much for stamps and covers. I have
also seen single sheet scanners and photo scanners used
successfully for philatelic purposes, although they require that
the item being scanned be sandwiched between clear plastic
sheets for feeding into the scanner.
Choosing Scanner Settings
When
you scan a stamp or cover, there are two settings you will have
to make in the scanning program: resolution and color depth.
Here are some tips to help you make the best settings for your
purposes
Color Depth
There are three color depth settings that will be useful when
scanning philatelic materials. The one you'll probably use most
often goes under different names in different manufacturers'
scanner programs: True Color, 24 Bit Color, and Millions of
Colors are some of the terms I have seen. Images scanned with
this color depth can display over 16 million different colors
permitting accurate rendition of all the color variations in the
item being scanned.
Scanner programs usually offer a 256 Color mode. Images scanned
with this color depth setting display a maximum of 256 different
colors. 256 Color images can be very realistic, particularly for
originals that have a limited range of colors to begin with. The
advantage of 256 Color images is that the files are
significantly smaller than true color image files. This color
depth may be suitable when scanning stamps that are printed in
only one or at most a few colors.
Gray
Scale or 256 Grays mode discards all color information and
creates an image that can display black, white, and 254 shades
of gray in between. Gray Scale images can be useful for
specialized purposes, such as when you are creating an image for
evaluation of pert condition or centering.
When
in doubt, I suggest that you always scan in True Color Mode. You
can always use your graphics program to convert a True Color
image to 256 Color or Gray Scale mode.
Resolution
Selecting the resolution of your scan is perhaps the most
important choice you'll make. In selecting a resolution, you
need to take into account the intended use of the scanned image.
Here's why.
Just
like the scan you make has a dots per inch resolution, what the
image is displayed on does too. Whether the image is displayed
on a screen or is printed on paper, there is a resolution
associated with the output device. A computer monitor might have
a resolution of 72 or 96 dpi, while a laser printer might be 600
dpi and an ink jet printer can be anywhere from 300 to 720 dpi
and even higher. The optimum results are always obtained if the
scanned image's resolution is selected based on the resolution
of the output device. There's more to consider, however –
specifically, the desired output size. Let's consider the
situation for images that are to be displayed on-screen.
The
default display of images on the screen uses one screen pixel
for each pixel in the image. This gives the ideal viewing
quality. Of course you can force the image to display at a
different size, larger or smaller than its "natural" size. Let's
see what happens when an image is displayed on-screen at a size
other than its natural size:
-
If
the image is displayed larger than its natural size, the
display software will have to interpolate the extra pixels
that are needed and the final result will lose detail and
sharpness.
-
If
the image is displayed smaller than its natural size some of
the information in the image will be discarded. You could have
gotten the same result with a smaller (lower resolution) image
and saved on disk space (and download time too, for the Web).
When
scanning images for screen display, you can calculate the ideal
resolution as follows. First, determine the relative size at
which the image will be displayed. If the image will be
displayed at half size, this factor will be 0.5; if it will be
displayed at twice its actual size, the factor will be 2.0.
Then, multiply this factor by 96 (the most common screen
resolution). The result is the scanning resolution you should
use. If your scanning software does not offer the precise
resolution you calculated, select he nearest value. For example,
if the ideal resolution is 192 dpi, use 200 dpi.
There's a simple formula you can use to determine the ideal
scanning resolution. First, let's define some terms:
SR =
ideal scanning resolution in dots per inch
DR =
resolution of final display device in dots per inch (96)
OW = width of the original being
scanned in inches
DW = width at which the image will
be printed or displayed in inches
Then:
SR = DR ´ DW / OW
With
this formula, you can easily determine the ideal resolution at
which you should scan. Unfortunately, things usually aren't that
simple. There are a number of factors that can, and usually do,
prevent you from using that "ideal" resolution when scanning:
-
You are not sure of the final use of the image - how it will
be reproduced and at what size.
-
There are multiple uses intended for the image - for example,
you want to make printed copies as well as display it on a Web
page.
-
The calculated ideal resolution is an intermediate value, such
as 117 dpi, that is not supported by your scanner.
In
these and other cases, the general rule is to "move up." In
other words, you should always move to a higher resolution
rather than to a lower one. Thus, if you cannot use the ideal
resolution of, say, 117 dpi, you should scan at 150 dpi rather
than at 100 dpi. Likewise, if you plan to use the image for
printing at 300 dpi as well as for screen display at 72 dpi, use
300 dpi when scanning if possible. Scanning at a higher
resolution captures the maximum amount of detail, from the
original. You can always throw away some of that information by
reducing the image's resolution after scanning (in your graphics
program), but you cannot regain information if the image was
scanned at too low a resolution. The process of changing an
image's resolution is called resampling. If, for example,
you scanned an image at 300 dpi for printing, you could resample
it at 72 dpi for screen display.
Another advantage of scanning at high resolution is that the
resulting images are easier to edit. Certain editing operations,
such as rotating an image, give better results with high
resolution images. Rotating an image can be useful if the item
was not perfectly aligned in the scanner, and is usually easier
than rescanning.
For saving local
copies of your scanned images you have many choices of file
format. The Windows Bitmap (BMP) format is widely used,
particularly by people using the Windows operating system.
Perhaps the most widely recognized file format is Tagged Image
File Format (TIF). Unless you have a specific reason to use
another format I doubt you can go wrong using BMP or TIF. The
resulting files are relatively large but unless you are scanning
a large number of stamps this should not be a problem.
For
Web publishing your choices are much more restricted. At present
there are only two graphics file formats with wide support on
the Internet: Graphical Interchange Format (GIF) and Joint
Photographic Expert Group (JPG) format. GIF format can be used
only with 256 color and gray scale images. Since many stamps,
particularly older ones, were printed in a limited range of
colors, the GIF format is perfectly adequate. When the purpose
of an image is to show the stamp's centering and perforations,
GIF will always serve perfectly well. Its advantage over the JPG
format (discussed next) is that the file size is often smaller.
GIF files are compressed to save space using a loss-free
compression scheme, which means that the image you get out is
exactly the same as the image you put in.
How
can a GIF file, with only 256 colors, give decent reproduction?
Here's how it works. When you save a file in GIF format, the
software analyzes the image and selects the 256 colors, from
some 16 million that are available, that the image will use
(this is called the palette). For example, with a stamp
that uses shades of red on a white background, the palette will
consist entirely of shades of white and red - enough different
shades to give an excellent reproduction.
For
True Color images you must use JPG. A True Color image can
display over 16 million different colors. For accurate
reproduction of stamps with many colors, such as those that use
photographs, JPG is required. The JPG format introduces one
additional complication. Like GIF, JPG is a compressed format.
Unlike GIF, JPG uses a lossy compression algorithm which means
that some information is lost during compression - in other
words, the image you get out is not as good as the image you put
in. When you save an image as a JPG file you must specify the
level of compression to use. More compression results in a
smaller file and lower image quality.
Image Size and Resolution
I
have noticed a lot of confusion about size and resolution of
digital images. I'll try to provide some clarification here.
Note that this discussion applies only to bitmapped digital
images, which are the kind you are dealing with when you use a
scanner or digital camera. Vector images are another matter but
they are not relevant in this context.
First of all you need to realize that a digital image really
does not have a physical size. To say that a digital image is,
say, 4x6 inches is meaningless. After all, the image is just a
collection of pixels stored in memory or on your hard disk. A
digital image does, however, have a pixel size - the number of
pixels horizontally and vertically. This is the only "size" that
is inherent in any bitmapped digital image.
It
can be useful, however, to assign a physical size to a digital
image. Suppose that you scan a 4x6 inch postcard. If the
resulting image is assigned the size "4x6 inches" then people
viewing the image will know the actual size of the postcard. It
also means that when you print the image at "normal" size it
will print at this size (at least with all the software I have
seen). All digital image files include this size information
with an image. Scanned images are assigned a physical size that
corresponds to the actual size of the area that is scanned -
which makes perfect sense.
Then
there's the matter of resolution, which is usually expressed in
terms of pixels per inch (ppi, sometimes referred to as dots per
inch or DPI). Perhaps you have already realized that once a
digital image is assigned a size it automatically has a
resolution. Here's the formula for horizontal resolution:
Horizontal pixels per inch = (number of horizontal pixels) /
(horizontal size in inches)
Note
that the vertical resolution can be different from the
horizontal resolution, but usually they are the same.
When
you are scanning, here's how it works. There are two things
under your control. One is the size of the area being scanned -
a single stamp, a postcard, whatever. The other is the
resolution that will be used for the scan. With some scanner
software you set the resolution directly - 96 dpi or 150 dpi,
for example. With other software you select the type of document
being scanned (color document, color photograph, etc.) and the
use you will make of it (printing, web page) and the software
selects the best resolution for you. In any case, when you make
the scan the resulting file has a pixel size that is determined
by these two settings:
number of horizontal pixels = (horizontal pixels per inch) x
(horizontal size in inches)
Thus, if you scan a 4x6 inch area at 150 ppi the resulting image
will be 600x900 pixels in size (4 x 150 is 600, 6 x 150 is 900).
What
about digital photographs, which unlike scanned images do not
have an inherent physical size? These images are assigned an
arbitrary resolution either by the camera or your software. For
example, when I open an image from my digital camera in
Photoshop it is assigned a resolution of 72dpi. Since the image
is 2560x1920 pixels, this results in the image having a
"physical size" of about 36 x 26 inches. This "size" is
essentially meaningless, of course.
In
your graphics program you can change any of these three image
size parameters: physical size, pixel size, or resolution.
Because they are all linked to one another, changing any one of
them means that one or both of the other parameters must change
as well. Let's look at an example. Start with the following
image:
Size: 4x6 inches
Pixel size: 400x600
Resolution: 100 ppi (pixels per inch)
Suppose you want to change the size to 8x12 inches. In order to
do so you must also do one of the following:
-
Change the pixel resolution to 800x1200 (resolution remains at
100 ppi).
-
Change the resolution to 50 ppi (pixel size remains 400x600).
Your
graphics program will do this automatically, but you must tell
it which one to do - change the pixel size or change the
resolution. Note that the process of changing an image's pixel
size is called resembling. The specific instructions for
this differ from one graphics program to another, but the
concept is the same.
Resembling of the image is controlled by the Resample Image
option. If this option is on:
-
Changing the width or height changes the pixel size while
leaving the resolution unchanged.
-
Changing the resolution changes the pixel size while leaving
the width and height unchanged.
-
Changing the pixel size changes the width and height while
leaving the resolution unchanged.
A
common need for scanned imaged of stamps is for on-line auction
listings. In my experience, selling many hundreds of lots at
on-line auctions, a good image is an important factor in whether
or not a lot sells. In addition to the general principles of
scanning that have already been discussed, here are a few
pointers for creating images for auctions.
-
Use the JPEG format for your files. In theory you could use
GIF for stamps that have only one or a few colors, but the
saving in file size is minimal and in my experience not worth
the effort of switching back and forth between formats.
-
Use a scanning dpi setting that is appropriate for the item
being scanned. I usually use 150dpi for single stamps, which
means that they will be displayed at about one and a half
times life size on the monitor screen. For small lots of 4-8
stamps, I'll use 100 dpi. For entire stock sheets or album
pages, 50dpi is good. In cases where a small detail of the
stamp design is an important part of its identification, I
sometimes go as high as 300 dpi.
-
If
you are scanning multiple items you can sometimes save time by
scanning them all at once into a large image, then using
cut-and-paste to create the individual images.
-
Trim your images closely, and be sure the stamp is "square" in
the frame. Which of these images looks better?
|